Postmenopausal Women

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Adding metformin to lifestyle therapy did not significantly improve ovulation rates compared to placebo plus lifestyle in obese women with PCOS, with an ovulation rate ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 6.6;

Effect: null; ovulation rate ratio 2.5 (whether ovulated), 1.2 (number of ovulations given ovulation); CI: 95% CI: (0.9, 6.6) for whether ovulated; 95% CI: (0

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)