Pelvic organ prolapse/stress urinary incontinence surgical mesh

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13