Explore › Outcome › Stress-specific continence
Outcome

Stress-specific continence

Also known as: Stress-specific continence at 6 months (negative cough stress test + no SUI re-treatment + no self-reported stress-specific leakage on MESA)
3 findings 1 paper 4 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
Retropubic midurethral sling1
conditions
Pelvic organ prolapse/stress urinary incontinence surgical mesh1
populations
Postmenopausal Women1
studys
PMC50352091

Findings (27)

None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction

Effect: null; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Size: OR 2.10 CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →

Papers (1)