Explore › Finding
Finding null
No statistically significant difference was found in stress-specific continence rates between the midurethral sling and Burch groups at 6 months (74% sling vs 57% Burch, p=0.06), though the direction consistently favored sling and the trial may have been underpowered for this endpoint.
Effect sizeOR 2.10
CI95% CI 0.95-4.64
Follow-up6 months
ComparatorBurch retropubic urethropexy (modified Tanagho procedure) performed through the same laparotomy incision as sacrocolpopexy
Effect summarynull; OR 2.10; CI: 95% CI 0.95-4.64

Connected entities

Interventions
Retropubic midurethral sling
Conditions
Pelvic organ prolapse/stress urinary incontinence surgical mesh
Outcomes
Stress-specific continence
Populations
Postmenopausal Women

Source

PMC5035209
Burch Retropubic Urethropexy Compared With Midurethral Sling With Concurrent Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Read on PMC → · View in graph →