Patient Satisfaction

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months