Urinary Incontinence
Related entities
Findings (50)
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti
Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of body weight had 3.7 times the odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in total urinary incontinence episodes compared with women who gained weight at 12 months
Effect: improvement; OR 3.7; CI: 95% CI 1.4-9.6