behavioral weight-loss program

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

Women in the weight-loss group perceived greater improvement in incontinence frequency, lower volume of urine loss, regarded incontinence as less of a problem, and reported higher treatment satisfacti

Effect: improvement; P<0.001 for all four satisfaction measures

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease