Urge Incontinence

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease