ExploreConditionUrge urinary incontinence
Condition

Urge urinary incontinence

Also known as: Incontinence, Urge Incontinence, Urinary Reflex Lack of bladder control if desire resisted Lack of bladder control if desire urgent Must urinate at once with urge Urge Incontinence Urge incontinence Urge incontinence of urine Urge incontinence of urine (finding) Urge urinary incontinence Urge urinary incontinence (finding) Urinary Incontinence, Urge +8 more
6 findings 2 papers 6 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
outcomes
populations
studys

Findings (50)

None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvement

Women who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with

Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5

Size: OR 3.9 CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
null

Weight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).

Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Size: 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease

Papers (2)