Urge urinary incontinence
Related entities
Findings (50)
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
improvementWomen who lost 5% to less than 10% of their body weight had significantly greater odds of achieving at least a 70% reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes at 6, 12, and 18 months compared with
Effect: improvement; OR 3.9; CI: 95% CI 1.2-12.5
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease
None
nullWeight loss did not significantly reduce urge incontinence episodes compared to control, despite a numerically larger decrease in the intervention group (42.4% vs 26.0%, P=0.14).
Effect: null; 42.4% decrease vs 26.0% decrease