Stress urinary incontinence

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

Weight loss of 5% to less than 10% was associated with significant reductions in stress urinary incontinence episode frequency at 6, 12, and 18 months, but the odds of achieving a 70% reduction in str

Effect: mixed; OR 2.3; CI: 95% CI 0.8-6.7

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease

The reduction in urinary incontinence from the weight-loss intervention was primarily attributable to stress incontinence, with the intervention group achieving a 57.6% decrease compared to 32.7% in c

Effect: improvement; 57.6% decrease vs 32.7% decrease