Fecal Incontinence

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

The VBC system produced significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's score, meeting minimally clinically important differences for both instruments at 3, 6

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement in all FIQOL subscales and St Mark's score meeting minimally important differences

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months

Patient satisfaction with the VBC system was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively, and 77-80% reported symptoms very much or much better on the PGI-I across all time points.

Effect: improvement; 94.4% satisfaction at 12 months