Successful device fitting rate

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit

Of 137 subjects who entered the fitting assessment, 62% achieved a successful fit, an improvement from the 54.5% in the initial study, possibly related to the provider learning curve.

Effect: improvement; 62.0% (85/137) achieved successful fit