Serious adverse events and surgical complications

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%

No difference was found in the rate of serious adverse events between groups (9% Burch vs 11% sling, p=0.77), with most events related to the laparotomy rather than the anti-incontinence procedure. No

Effect: null; 9% vs 11%