Explore › Outcome › Overall continence
Outcome

Overall continence

Also known as: Overall continence at 6 months (composite: negative cough stress test + no interim SUI re-treatment + ICIQ-SF score of 0)
3 findings 1 paper 4 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
Retropubic midurethral sling1
conditions
Pelvic organ prolapse/stress urinary incontinence surgical mesh1
populations
Postmenopausal Women1
studys
PMC50352091

Findings (27)

None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

No difference was found in overall continence between the midurethral sling and Burch urethropexy groups at 6-month follow-up when performed concurrently with sacrocolpopexy (51% sling vs 41% Burch, p

Effect: null; OR 1.49; CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13

Size: OR 1.49 CI: 95% CI 0.71-3.13
PMC5035209
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →

Papers (1)