ExploreInterventionPREPP (Practical Resources for Effective Postpartum Parenting)
Intervention

PREPP (Practical Resources for Effective Postpartum Parenting)

Also known as: PREPP (Practical Resources for Effective Postpartum Parenting): 3 in-person coaching sessions (prenatal at 34-38 weeks, in-hospital post-delivery, 6 weeks postpartum) plus 2-week phone check-in, combining 5 infant behavioral techniques (focal feed, day/night differentiation, delayed night feeding, increased carrying >=3h/day, swaddling) with supportive psychotherapy, psychoeducation, and mindfulness meditation PREPP (Practical Resources for Effective Postpartum Parenting): 3 in-person coaching sessions (prenatal at 34-38 weeks, in-hospital post-delivery, 6 weeks postpartum) plus 2-week phone check-in, combining 5 infant behavioral techniques with supportive psychotherapy, psychoeducation, and mindfulness meditation PREPP
15 findings 1 paper 8 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

conditions
outcomes
populations
studys

Findings (50)

None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Mothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.

Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68

Size: F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84
None
improvement

Women who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho

Effect: improvement; B = −7.84

Size: B = −7.84

Papers (1)