PREPP (Practical Resources for Effective Postpartum Parenting)
Related entities
Findings (50)
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementMothers who received PREPP reported significantly fewer bouts of infant fussing and crying at 6 weeks postpartum than mothers in the ETAU group.
Effect: improvement; F (1, 28) = 5.68
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84
None
improvementWomen who received PREPP decreased significantly in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms (HAM-A) between pre-randomization and 6 weeks postpartum, with effects persisting to 16 weeks, while ETAU women sho
Effect: improvement; B = −7.84