Patient-reported goal attainment and comprehensive functioning outcomes after surgery compared to pessary for pelvic organ prolapse
Extracted findings (4)
Prolapse surgery
improvementA higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette
Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment
Prolapse surgery
improvementWomen who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only
Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers
Pessary
adverse31 of 80 pessary patients (39%) discontinued pessary use or crossed over to surgery, with reasons including discomfort (47%), persistent bulge symptoms (42%), urinary symptoms (32%), and bowel symptom
Effect: adverse; 31 of 80 pessary patients discontinued or crossed over to surgery; 5% of discontinuers achieved 100% goal attainment vs 56% surgery
Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%
Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary