ExploreOutcomeGAS-Light - Goal Attainment Scaling-Light
Outcome

GAS-Light - Goal Attainment Scaling-Light

Also known as: GAS-Light - Goal Attainment Scaling-Light Goal Attainment Scaling-Light Goal Attainment Scaling-Light (assessment scale) Patient-reported goal attainment and global impression of improvement
3 findings 1 paper 4 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
conditions
populations
studys

Findings (27)

None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon

Papers (1)