ExploreInterventionProlapse surgery
Intervention

Prolapse surgery

Also known as: Prolapse surgery (any modality including hysterectomy, apical suspension, anterior/posterior repair, anti-incontinence procedures) Prolapse surgery (any modality)
6 findings 1 paper 6 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

conditions
outcomes
populations
studys

Findings (50)

None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only

Effect: improvement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Size: Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary con
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon
None
improvement

A higher proportion of women in the surgery arm reported successfully achieving symptom and function goals compared to pessary, with 97% of surgery patients reporting 'much better' or 'very much bette

Effect: improvement; 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discontinuation achieved 100% goal attainment

Size: 56% surgery vs 39% pessary continuation vs 5% pessary discon

Papers (1)