ExploreFinding
Finding improvement
Women who had surgery reported significantly greater improvements in PROMIS Physical Function, Social Roles, and Depression domains compared to the pessary group (P<0.05), including when compared only to women who continued pessary use (Physical Function 8.7 vs 5.2, P=0.04; Depression 4.0 vs 0.5, P=0.03).
Effect sizePhysical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers
ComparatorLong-term pessary use for symptomatic POP
Effect summaryimprovement; Physical Function mean change 8.7 surgery vs 5.2 pessary continuers; Depression mean change 4.0 surgery vs 0.5 pessary continuers

Connected entities

Interventions
Conditions
Outcomes
Populations

Source

PMC5086295
Patient-reported goal attainment and comprehensive functioning outcomes after surgery compared to pessary for pelvic organ prolapse
Read on PMC → · View in graph →