ExploreOutcomeUrinary symptom change
Outcome

Urinary symptom change

Also known as: Patient-reported urinary symptom severity and quality of life Urinary symptom change Urinary symptom change (finding) Urinary symptom goal attainment QoL
6 findings 2 papers 7 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
conditions
populations
studys

Findings (50)

None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
improvement

At 3 months, the sling group had significantly greater improvement in urinary symptoms (PFDI including UDI stress subscale and Incontinence Severity Index) than the sham group, but at 12 months only t

Effect: improvement; Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling group at 3 and 12 months

Size: Greater improvement in UDI stress subscale and ISI in sling
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary
None
null

Achievement of urinary symptom goals was not different between women who underwent a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure in the surgery group compared to the pessary group (60% surgery versus 64%

Effect: null; 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Size: 60% surgery vs 64% pessary

Papers (2)