Papers3543828

Anticholinergic Therapy vs. OnabotulinumtoxinA for Urgency Urinary Incontinence

The New England journal of medicine · 8-11-2012 · 3543828 on PMC →
Entities in this paper
OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 unit powder for solution for injection vial Anticholinergic idiopathic urgency urinary incontinence Reduction in number of falls Complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence Dry mouth Duration of symptom

Extracted findings (5)

OnabotulinumtoxinA and anticholinergic therapy produced equivalent reductions in daily urgency urinary incontinence episodes over 6 months (3.3 vs 3.4 episodes/day reduction from a baseline of 5.0/day

Effect: null; 3.3 vs 3.4 episodes per day reduction

Size: 3.3 vs 3.4 episodes per day reduction

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
Anticholinergic
adverse

Anticholinergic therapy caused significantly more dry mouth than onabotulinumtoxinA (46% vs 31%, P=0.02), though dry mouth was not a major cause of drug withdrawal.

Effect: adverse; 46% vs 31%

Size: 46% vs 31%

OnabotulinumtoxinA caused significantly more urinary tract infections (33% vs 13%, P<0.001) and need for catheterization at 2 months (5% vs 0%, P=0.01) compared to anticholinergic therapy, reflecting

Effect: adverse; 33% vs 13% for UTI; 5% vs 0% for catheterization at 2 months

Size: 33% vs 13% for UTI; 5% vs 0% for catheterization at 2 months

After cessation of oral medications at 6 months, significantly fewer women in the anticholinergic group maintained adequate symptom control at month 7 compared to onabotulinumtoxinA (50% vs 62%, P=0.0

Effect: improvement; 62% vs 50% adequate control at 7 months; 38% vs 25% at 12 months

Size: 62% vs 50% adequate control at 7 months; 38% vs 25% at 12 mo