ExploreOutcomeComplete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence
Outcome

Complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence

Also known as: Complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence UI
3 findings 1 paper 5 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
conditions
populations
studys

Findings (27)

None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%
None
improvement

Women receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were significantly more likely to achieve complete resolution of urgency urinary incontinence compared to those receiving anticholinergic therapy (27% vs 13%, P=0.00

Effect: improvement; 27% vs 13%

Size: 27% vs 13%

Papers (1)