PMC6190831

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76