IGT reversion
Related entities
Findings (27)
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76
None
improvementNon-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family
Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76