reversion to normal glucose tolerance

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

Non-Hispanic White ethnic background conferred a 5-fold greater odds of reverting from impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance compared to Non-Hispanic Black, after adjusting for family

Effect: improvement; OR 5.06; CI: 95% CI 1.86, 13.76

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)