ExploreInterventionNatural History
Intervention

Natural History

Also known as: History, Natural NATURAL HIST Natural History Natural history observation over 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling (elimination of sugar-sweetened beverages, reduction of screen time, promotion of physical activity, sustainable lifestyle changes) in obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance Natural history observation over 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling in obese youth with baseline normal glucose tolerance PA NGT IGT SSB
6 findings 1 paper 6 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

conditions
outcomes
populations
studys

Findings (50)

None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
improvement

In a multiethnic cohort of 162 obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance followed prospectively for a mean of 2.9 years with standard-of-care dietary counseling, 65% reverted to normal gluc

Effect: improvement; 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)

Size: 65% reversion rate (IGT to NGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Papers (1)