ExploreOutcomeprogression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance
Outcome

progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance

Also known as: progression from NGT to IGT NGT IGT
6 findings 1 paper 7 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
conditions
populations
studys

Findings (50)

None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
null

Ethnicity was not a statistically significant predictor of progression from normal glucose tolerance to impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth, unlike its strong role in predicting IGT reversion, w

Effect: null; OR not reported (p=NS)

Size: OR not reported (p=NS)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)
None
decline

Among 364 obese youth with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 14% progressed to impaired glucose tolerance over 2.9 years, with progression characterized by a significant decline in beta-cell funct

Effect: decline; 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Size: 14% progression rate (NGT to IGT)

Papers (1)