ExploreInterventionBeta-cell compensatory hyper-responsiveness
Intervention

Beta-cell compensatory hyper-responsiveness

Also known as: Beta-cell compensatory hyper-responsiveness (measured as change in oral disposition index) in obese youth with baseline impaired glucose tolerance IGT
3 findings 1 paper 4 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

conditions
outcomes
populations
studys

Findings (27)

None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)
None
improvement

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Size: 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Papers (1)