Diabetes mellitus due to genetic defect in beta cell function

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)

Obese youth who reverted from IGT to NGT exhibited a 4-fold increase in oral disposition index, reflecting dynamic beta-cell hyper-responsiveness, while those who persisted with IGT or progressed to T

Effect: improvement; 4-fold increase in oDI (from 0.94 to 3.90)