Number of cores positive / total number of cores

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)

Participants who had family and friends join in physical activity at baseline attended approximately 2 more intervention sessions during the first year compared to those without such support (beta=1.8

Effect: improvement; beta = 1.89 (SE 0.92)