ExploreInterventionantenatal sleep education
Intervention

antenatal sleep education

Also known as: Brief antenatal sleep education (1 group session during pregnancy + 1-hour home visit at 3 weeks postpartum) teaching infant self-settling bedtime strategies
6 findings 1 paper 7 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

conditions
outcomes
populations
studys

Findings (50)

None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou

Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33

Size: cumulative OR = 1.63 CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction
None
improvement

Children of parents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had approximately 6% fewer sleep self-control difficulties at age 3.5 compared to controls, with the effect partially mediated by consisten

Effect: improvement; approximately 6% reduction

Size: approximately 6% reduction

Papers (1)