Parents
Related entities
Findings (27)
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33
None
improvementParents assigned to the Sleep intervention group had 63% greater odds of consistently using more bedtime strategies at 4 and 6 months compared to the Control group, and parents in the Combination grou
Effect: improvement; cumulative OR = 1.63; CI: 95% CI 1.14–2.33