ExploreInterventionMulti-component behavioral obesity prevention program
Intervention

Multi-component behavioral obesity prevention program

Also known as: Multi-component behavioral obesity prevention program (NFN+) embedded in home visitation: education, goal-setting, problem-solving, self-monitoring, fruit/vegetable coupons, community resource linkages, toolkit; 8 teaching modules delivered during biweekly 60-min home visits over 12 months
15 findings 1 paper 11 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

conditions
outcomes
populations
studys

Findings (50)

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

Mothers in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) were more likely to continue breastfeeding at 6 months (p = 0.03) and 12 months (p = 0.003) compared with standard home visitation (NFN), with 44

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

At 12 months, infants in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) experienced fewer nocturnal awakenings than infants in the standard program (NFN) (p = 0.04), though there was no difference in sle

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

At 12 months, infants in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) experienced fewer nocturnal awakenings than infants in the standard program (NFN) (p = 0.04), though there was no difference in sle

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

At 12 months, infants in the enhanced home visitation program (NFN+) experienced fewer nocturnal awakenings than infants in the standard program (NFN) (p = 0.04), though there was no difference in sle

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

None
improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

None
null

There were no differences between the enhanced and standard home visitation programs in the timing of introduction of solids or juice/SSB, soothability scores, tummy time, TV/screen time duration at 1

Effect: null

None
null

There were no differences between the enhanced and standard home visitation programs in the timing of introduction of solids or juice/SSB, soothability scores, tummy time, TV/screen time duration at 1

Effect: null

None
null

There were no differences between the enhanced and standard home visitation programs in the timing of introduction of solids or juice/SSB, soothability scores, tummy time, TV/screen time duration at 1

Effect: null

None
null

There were no differences between the enhanced and standard home visitation programs in the timing of introduction of solids or juice/SSB, soothability scores, tummy time, TV/screen time duration at 1

Effect: null

None
null

There were no differences between the enhanced and standard home visitation programs in the timing of introduction of solids or juice/SSB, soothability scores, tummy time, TV/screen time duration at 1

Effect: null

Papers (1)