obesity prevention

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement

NFN+ dyads were significantly more likely to be retained in the program at 12 months compared with NFN dyads (84.6% vs 56.1%, p = 0.04), with mothers who dropped out being younger than those who staye

Effect: improvement