PMC3448978

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST did not produce significantly different rates of change in social anxiety symptoms compared to school counseling during either the intervention or follow-up phase, despite IPT-AST's focus on i

Effect: null; t(91) = -0.10

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74

IPT-AST produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms than school counseling during the intervention phase, with the advantage maintained at 6-month follow-up but only marginally si

Effect: improvement; d = 0.74