ExploreOutcomeER-negative invasive breast cancer incidence
Outcome

ER-negative invasive breast cancer incidence

Also known as: ER-negative invasive breast cancer incidence BCa
9 findings 1 paper 7 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
conditions
populations
studys

Findings (50)

None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
decline

Greater adherence to an unhealthful plant-based diet was associated with a 28% higher risk of ER-negative breast cancer, though this association was attenuated after adjustment for dietary fiber or to

Effect: decline; HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28; CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 1.28 CI: 95% CI 1.08, 1.51
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90
None
improvement

Greater adherence to a healthful plant-based diet was associated with a 23% lower risk of ER-negative breast cancer, the strongest inverse association observed among all subtypes, robust to adjustment

Effect: improvement; HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77; CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Size: HR Q5 vs Q1 0.77 CI: 95% CI 0.65, 0.90

Papers (1)