ExploreConditionchronic HCV infection
Condition

chronic HCV infection

Also known as: chronic HCV infection; HIV/HCV co-infection HCV
6 findings 1 paper 4 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
outcomes
studys

Findings (50)

None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
decline

Baseline insulin resistance (HOMA-IR >2) was independently associated with failure to achieve sustained virological response during pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin retreatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patient

Effect: decline; AOR 0.17; CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64

Size: AOR 0.17 CI: 95% CI 0.05–0.64
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)
None
improvement

Retreatment with pegIFN-α-2a and weight-based ribavirin achieved sustained virological response in 15% of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had previously failed interferon-based therapy.

Effect: improvement; 15% SVR (14/96)

Size: 15% SVR (14/96)

Papers (1)