Depression

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

Exercise training produced a moderate effect of differential improvement in depressive symptoms compared to wait-list control, with the exercise group showing 17% improvement while the control group w

Effect: improvement; d=.57; CI: 95% CI -6.8, 0.3

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87

At 6 weeks, participants receiving CBTi had significantly greater reductions in depression severity (HAM-D) compared to attention control, with a large effect size (d = 0.87), even before beginning PT

Effect: improvement; d = 0.87