Explore › Intervention › Assessment using PHQ-9 depression questionnaire
Intervention

Assessment using PHQ-9 depression questionnaire

Also known as: Assessment using PHQ-9 depression questionnaire Full PHQ-9 depression screening (single-stage, all 9 DSM-IV items) administered during AMI hospitalization PHQ-9 Patient Health Questionnaire Nine Item Patient Health Questionnaire Nine Item (observable entity) Patient Health Questionnaire Nine Item score Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-9 Patient health questionnaire-nine item Patient health questionnaire-nine item (procedure)
3 findings 1 paper 3 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

conditions
Depression1
outcomes
Depression screening1
studys
PMC33363601

Findings (27)

None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →

Papers (1)