Explore › Outcome › Depression screening
Outcome

Depression screening

Also known as: Concordance of depression screening results between clinical protocol and concurrent research registry assessments (test-retest reliability of positive cases) Depression screening Depression screening (procedure)
3 findings 1 paper 3 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
Assessment using PHQ-9 depression questionnaire1
conditions
Depression1
studys
PMC33363601

Findings (27)

None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

The full PHQ-9 showed substantially better test-retest concordance than the PHQ-2 alone for identifying depressed AMI patients, with moderate agreement (Kappa 0.51) versus only fair agreement (Kappa 0

Effect: improvement; Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2); CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case agreement)

Size: Kappa = 0.51 (PHQ-9) vs Kappa = 0.29 (PHQ-2) CI: 95% CI 42.8%-80.2% (PHQ-9 positive case
PMC3336360
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →

Papers (1)