PMC10156903

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Central executive training produced non-specific improvements in overall response speed on the Number-Color task, with similar improvements on both shift trials and non-shift trials, suggesting workin

Effect: improvement; d = 0.70

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63

Inhibitory control training was superior to central executive training for improving set shifting accuracy in children with ADHD, with a medium-to-large treatment-by-time interaction and ICT producing

Effect: improvement; d = 0.63