Set shifting speed

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treat

Effect: improvement; d = 0.59

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null

Central executive training did not produce improvements in set shifting speed on either task, with Bayesian evidence supporting the null hypothesis.

Effect: null