ExploreFinding
Finding improvement
Inhibitory control training produced significant improvements in set shifting speed on the Global-Local task, though this finding should be considered tentative given the non-significant omnibus treatment-by-time interaction for shifting speed.
Effect sized = 0.59
Follow-up10 weeks
ComparatorCentral executive training (CET) — matched digital therapeutic targeting working memory
Effect summaryimprovement; d = 0.59
Effect modifiers[{"modifier": "ADHD medication status", "interaction_p": "p = .02", "direction": "amplifies", "stratum_details": "Medication status interacted with time in the shifting speed model (p = .02, eta-squared = .10); children prescribed ADHD medication showed greater speed improvements (p = .02, eta-squared = .10) than children not prescribed medication (p = .99). However, medication status did not interact with treatment group.", "plain_language": "Children who were on ADHD medication showed more improvement in shifting speed over time than children not on medication, regardless of which training they received", "annotation_notes": "Sensitivity analysis. Medication amplified the time effect but did not interact with treatment allocation, meaning it didn't differentially affect ICT vs CET."}]

Connected entities

Interventions
Conditions
Outcomes
Populations

Source

PMC10156903
Does Training Working Memory or Inhibitory Control Produce Far-Transfer Improvements in Set Shifting for Children with ADHD? A Randomized Controlled Trial
Read on PMC → · View in graph →