Cumulative Incidence

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76

Hispanic patients aged 10 years and older treated for ALL on DFCI 05-001 had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis compared to non-Hispanic patients, remaining significant in mul

Effect: improvement; HR 0.28; CI: 95% CI 0.10-0.76