Motivational interview and Internet-based CBT/IPT depression prevention program

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044

Adolescents in the motivational interview group were significantly less likely to report hopelessness at 12 weeks compared to the brief advice group (2% vs 15%, p=0.044), though this difference did no

Effect: improvement; 2% vs 15%, p=0.044