Depressed mood

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null

Primary depressive disorder and continuous symptom outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks were similar between the MI and BA groups, with no statistically significant between-group differences on CES-D-10 scores

Effect: null