Standardized adolescent depression screening tool completed

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Adolescents receiving motivational interviewing plus Internet-based depression prevention were significantly less likely to experience a clinically significant depressive episode by 12 weeks compared

Effect: improvement; OR 0.068; CI: 95% CI: 0.007, 0.61

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0

Both groups of at-risk adolescents receiving an Internet-based depression prevention program in primary care demonstrated substantial declines in depressed mood scores on the CES-D-10 from baseline to

Effect: improvement; Cohen's d 0.69 (all participants, baseline to 6 weeks); CI: 95% CI: 0.38, 1.0