Uterosacral ligament

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)