Genitalia, sexual function and urinary tract observations

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)

There were no significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for PISQ-12 scores, overall sexual activity, dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, or sexua

Effect: null; No significant differences between surgical groups (all p>0.05)