Quality of Life

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

Patients receiving deep brain stimulation experienced significant improvements on the PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales compared with best medical therapy at 6 months.

Effect: improvement; Significant improvement on PDQ-39 summary measure and 7 of 8 subscales

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)

There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation for any quality of life measure at any postopera

Effect: null; No clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups (all p>0.05)